Understanding Lasers: Chapter 2 Quiz
Source: Jeff Hecht, Understanding Lasers: An Entry-Level Guide, fourth edition (2019), Chapter 2 quiz, printed pages 55–57. The questions are paraphrased.
Quick answers
Question |
Answer |
|---|---|
1 |
b, \(2.83\times10^{13}\ \mathrm{Hz}\) |
2 |
c, \(6.63\times10^{-20}\ \mathrm{J}\) |
3 |
b, \(3.00\ \mathrm{\mu m}\) |
4 |
a, destructive |
5 |
c, \(656\ \mathrm{nm}\) |
6 |
d, \(333\ \mathrm{nm}\) |
7 |
d, \(17.5^\circ\) |
8 |
e, none; \(T=0.0625\) |
9 |
d, \(20\ \mathrm{cm}\) |
10 |
c, magnitude \(1\) |
Worked reasoning
Frequency from wavelength: b. Use \(c=f\lambda\):
\[f=\frac{2.998\times10^8\ \mathrm{m/s}} {10.6\times10^{-6}\ \mathrm m} =2.83\times10^{13}\ \mathrm{Hz}.\]Photon energy: c. Planck’s relation gives
\[E=hf=(6.626\times10^{-34}\ \mathrm{J\,s})(10^{14}\ \mathrm{Hz}) =6.63\times10^{-20}\ \mathrm J.\]Wavelength from frequency: b.
\[\lambda=\frac{c}{f}=\frac{2.998\times10^8}{10^{14}} =2.998\times10^{-6}\ \mathrm m\approx3\ \mathrm{\mu m}.\]Equal waves separated by 180 degrees: a. One field is the negative of the other at every instant, so their amplitudes cancel: destructive interference.
Hydrogen transition: c. The Rydberg relation for the magnitude of the \(n=2\leftrightarrow3\) transition is
\[\frac{1}{\lambda}=R_H\left(\frac{1}{2^2}-\frac{1}{3^2}\right) =R_H\frac{5}{36}, \qquad \lambda\approx656\ \mathrm{nm}.\]Two absorbed photons followed by one emitted photon: d. Energies add, and \(E=hc/\lambda\):
\[\frac{1}{\lambda_e}=\frac{1}{500\ \mathrm{nm}} +\frac{1}{1000\ \mathrm{nm}}, \qquad \lambda_e=333\ \mathrm{nm}.\]Refraction: d. Snell’s law gives
\[n_1\sin\theta_1=n_2\sin\theta_2,qquad \theta_2=\sin^{-1}\!\left(\frac{1.2\sin30^\circ}{2.0}\right) =17.46^\circ.\]Transmission through four half-transmission layers: e. A \(2\ \mathrm{cm}\) sample contains four \(0.5\ \mathrm{cm}\) layers, so Beer–Lambert multiplication gives
\[T=(0.5)^4=0.0625=6.25\%.\]No listed numerical choice equals this result.
Important
Answer-key discrepancy
The printed key selects c, \(0.018\). That would follow from treating \(0.5\ \mathrm{cm}\) as a \(1/e\) absorption length, not from the stated fact that it transmits one half. For the wording as printed, e (none of the above) is correct.
Thin-lens image distance: d.
\[\frac1f=\frac1{d_o}+\frac1{d_i},\qquad \frac1{d_i}=\frac1{10}-\frac1{20}=\frac1{20}\ \mathrm{cm^{-1}},\]hence \(d_i=20\ \mathrm{cm}\).
Image-to-object size ratio: c. The transverse magnification is \(m=-d_i/d_o=-1\); the minus sign means inverted, while the requested size ratio is \(|m|=1\).