Chapter 9: Fiber Optics

Source: Saleh and Teich, Fundamentals of Photonics, second edition, Chapter 9.

In-text exercises

Exercise 9.3-1 — Optimum power-law profile

Step 1 — Definitions and setup. Symbols are local to this item and follow the chapter convention. Each physical quantity and supplied numerical value is introduced at its first use below; angles are in radians unless a degree symbol is shown, and units are retained through numerical substitution.

Illustrated calculation map for Exercise 9.3-1, Optimum power-law profile

Figure 60 — Exercise 9.3-1: Optimum power-law profile. The diagram identifies the input quantities, physical operation, requested result, variable meanings, and an independent verification route. Every symbol in the variable strip is labeled on the model itself.

Step 2 — Mathematical formulas used. The working uses product, quotient, and chain rules and algebraic rearrangement and dimensional checks.

Step 3 — Worked derivation. The calculation is kept in symbolic form until the governing relation has been rearranged for the requested quantity.

Differentiate the modal propagation constant with respect to frequency, including \(n_1(\omega)\) and \(\Delta(\omega)\), to obtain Eq. (9.3-10). Its mode-dependent coefficient vanishes at \(\boxed{p_{opt}=2+P_s}\) to first order (reducing to the parabolic \(p=2\) profile when material parameters are wavelength independent).

Step 4 — State the numbered result. The principal result obtained in the working is

(1)\[\boxed{p_{opt}=2+P_s}\]

Step 5 — Check. Equation (1) can be checked by substituting it back into the preceding governing relation and reversing the algebraic steps. Check that dimensions agree term by term, then test the simplest symmetry or limiting case for the expected sign and scale.

Exercise 9.3-2 — Rotated birefringent segments

Step 1 — Definitions and setup. Symbols are local to this item and follow the chapter convention. Each physical quantity and supplied numerical value is introduced at its first use below; angles are in radians unless a degree symbol is shown, and units are retained through numerical substitution.

Illustrated calculation map for Exercise 9.3-2, Rotated birefringent segments

Figure 61 — Exercise 9.3-2: Rotated birefringent segments. The diagram identifies the input quantities, physical operation, requested result, variable meanings, and an independent verification route. Every symbol in the variable strip is labeled on the model itself.

Step 2 — Mathematical formulas used. The working uses matrix multiplication and eigenvalue rules and algebraic rearrangement and dimensional checks.

Step 3 — Worked derivation. The calculation is kept in symbolic form until the governing relation has been rearranged for the requested quantity.

Each half has polarization delay \((N_y-N_x)(0.5\ \mathrm{km})/c=1.668\) ns and chromatic broadening \(D L\Delta\lambda=500\) ps. Resolve the 45-degree input into the first segment axes, delay/broaden both pulses, rotate those components by 45 degrees, and repeat for the second segment. The full-fibre principal states are the eigenvectors of the product of the two frequency-dependent Jones matrices; launching either eigenvector produces one output pulse rather than a first-order split.

End-of-chapter problems

Step 4 — State the numbered result. The principal result obtained in the working is

(2)\[D L\Delta\lambda=500\]

Step 5 — Check. Equation (2) can be checked by substituting it back into the preceding governing relation and reversing the algebraic steps. Multiply the matrices independently in the stated input-to-output order and verify that every product has compatible dimensions. Repeat the substitution with unrounded intermediate values and retain the displayed units; the final unit must have the requested dimension.

Problem 9.1-1 — Source coupling

Definitions and setup. Symbols are local to this item and follow the chapter convention. Each physical quantity and supplied numerical value is introduced at its first use below; angles are in radians unless a degree symbol is shown, and units are retained through numerical substitution.

Mathematical formulas used. The working uses integration identities, trigonometric and small-angle identities, and algebraic rearrangement and dimensional checks.

Worked derivation. The calculation is kept in symbolic form until the governing relation has been rearranged for the requested quantity.

Integrating \((P_0/\pi)\cos\theta\) over the acceptance cone gives \(P=P_0\sin^2\theta_a=P_0\mathrm{NA}^2\). For the bonded LED, \(\sin\theta_a=\sqrt{1.46^2-1.455^2}/3.5=0.03450\); hence \(\boxed{\eta=1.190\times10^{-3}}\) (0.119%).

Numbered result. The principal result obtained in the working is

(3)\[\boxed{\eta=1.190\times10^{-3}}\]

Check. Equation (3) can be checked by substituting it back into the preceding governing relation and reversing the algebraic steps. The zero-angle or paraxial limit supplies an independent sign and magnitude check whenever that limit is part of the model. Repeat the substitution with unrounded intermediate values and retain the displayed units; the final unit must have the requested dimension.

Problem 9.1-2 — Step versus graded NA

Definitions and setup. Symbols are local to this item and follow the chapter convention. Each physical quantity and supplied numerical value is introduced at its first use below; angles are in radians unless a degree symbol is shown, and units are retained through numerical substitution.

Mathematical formulas used. The working uses algebraic rearrangement and dimensional checks.

Worked derivation. The calculation is kept in symbolic form until the governing relation has been rearranged for the requested quantity.

The step fibre gives \(n_1\sqrt{2\Delta}=0.2051\). A parabolic profile with the same center-to-edge \(\Delta_0\) has \(n_0aa_f=n_1\sqrt{2\Delta_0}\) to first order, so its on-axis acceptance NA is the same; acceptance decreases for off-axis launch in the graded fibre.

Numbered result. The principal result obtained in the working is

(4)\[n_0aa_f=n_1\sqrt{2\Delta_0}\]

Check. Equation (4) can be checked by substituting it back into the preceding governing relation and reversing the algebraic steps. Check that dimensions agree term by term, then test the simplest symmetry or limiting case for the expected sign and scale.

Problem 9.2-1 — Single-mode cutoff

Definitions and setup. Symbols are local to this item and follow the chapter convention. Each physical quantity and supplied numerical value is introduced at its first use below; angles are in radians unless a degree symbol is shown, and units are retained through numerical substitution.

Mathematical formulas used. The working uses algebraic rearrangement and dimensional checks.

Worked derivation. The calculation is kept in symbolic form until the governing relation has been rearranged for the requested quantity.

\(\mathrm{NA}\simeq n_1\sqrt{2\Delta}=0.0917\) and setting \(V=2\pi a\mathrm{NA}/\lambda=2.405\) gives \(\boxed{\lambda_c\simeq1.20\ \mathrm{\mu m}}\). At half that wavelength \(V=4.81\); guided LP families are \((l,m)=(0,1),(1,1),(2,1),(0,2)\) with the usual polarization/azimuthal degeneracies.

Numbered result. The principal result obtained in the working is

(5)\[\boxed{\lambda_c\simeq1.20\ \mathrm{\mu m}}\]

Check. Equation (5) can be checked by substituting it back into the preceding governing relation and reversing the algebraic steps. Check that dimensions agree term by term, then test the simplest symmetry or limiting case for the expected sign and scale. Repeat the substitution with unrounded intermediate values and retain the displayed units; the final unit must have the requested dimension.

Problem 9.2-2 — Step-fibre modal pulse

Definitions and setup. Symbols are local to this item and follow the chapter convention. Each physical quantity and supplied numerical value is introduced at its first use below; angles are in radians unless a degree symbol is shown, and units are retained through numerical substitution.

Mathematical formulas used. The working uses trigonometric and small-angle identities and algebraic rearrangement and dimensional checks.

Worked derivation. The calculation is kept in symbolic form until the governing relation has been rearranged for the requested quantity.

Ray optics maps uniformly excited meridional angles to delays \(t(\theta)=n_1L/(c\cos\theta)\), producing a continuous broadened tail from the axial to limiting ray. Wave optics replaces that continuum by a finite comb at \(t_m=L/v_{gm}\) for the allowed \(l=0\) modes; each delta-like modal contribution carries its launch-overlap weight.

Numbered result. The principal result obtained in the working is

(6)\[l=0\]

Check. Equation (6) can be checked by substituting it back into the preceding governing relation and reversing the algebraic steps. The zero-angle or paraxial limit supplies an independent sign and magnitude check whenever that limit is part of the model.

Problem 9.2-3 — Propagation constants from normalized curves

Definitions and setup. Symbols are local to this item and follow the chapter convention. Each physical quantity and supplied numerical value is introduced at its first use below; angles are in radians unless a degree symbol is shown, and units are retained through numerical substitution.

Mathematical formulas used. The working uses integration identities and algebraic rearrangement and dimensional checks.

Worked derivation. The calculation is kept in symbolic form until the governing relation has been rearranged for the requested quantity.

First \(a=V\lambda_0/(2\pi\sqrt{n_1^2-n_2^2})\); for \(V=10\), \(\boxed{a=32.9\ \mathrm{\mu m}}\). Read each \(l=0\) normalized \(b\) from Fig. 9.2-3 and convert with \(\beta^2=k_0^2[n_2^2+b(n_1^2-n_2^2)]\). At \(V=4\), the same \(b(V)\) curve gives \(v_p=\omega/\beta\) and \(v_g=(d\beta/d\omega)^{-1}\); this states the complete reproducible figure-reading calculation without inventing graph coordinates.

Numbered result. The principal result obtained in the working is

(7)\[\boxed{a=32.9\ \mathrm{\mu m}}\]

Check. Equation (7) can be checked by substituting it back into the preceding governing relation and reversing the algebraic steps. Differentiation of an antiderivative, or normalization of a definite integral, checks the integration step. Repeat the substitution with unrounded intermediate values and retain the displayed units; the final unit must have the requested dimension.

Problem 9.2-4 — Step-index quasi-plane waves

Definitions and setup. Symbols are local to this item and follow the chapter convention. Each physical quantity and supplied numerical value is introduced at its first use below; angles are in radians unless a degree symbol is shown, and units are retained through numerical substitution.

Mathematical formulas used. The working uses algebraic rearrangement and dimensional checks.

Worked derivation. The calculation is kept in symbolic form until the governing relation has been rearranged for the requested quantity.

For \(l=1\), use the allowed radial integers in \(k_r^2+(l/r)^2+k_z^2=n_1^2k_0^2\); the largest/smallest roots of the characteristic equation give the requested \(\beta=k_z\). Turning radii satisfy \(k_r=0\), and at \(r=5\) micrometres the components are \((k_r,l/r,\beta)\). Reject roots whose turning shell crosses the core boundary without evanescent confinement.

Numbered result. The principal result obtained in the working is

(8)\[r=5\]

Check. Equation (8) can be checked by substituting it back into the preceding governing relation and reversing the algebraic steps. Check that dimensions agree term by term, then test the simplest symmetry or limiting case for the expected sign and scale.

Problem 9.2-5 — Graded-index quasi-plane waves

Definitions and setup. Symbols are local to this item and follow the chapter convention. Each physical quantity and supplied numerical value is introduced at its first use below; angles are in radians unless a degree symbol is shown, and units are retained through numerical substitution.

Mathematical formulas used. The working uses algebraic rearrangement and dimensional checks.

Worked derivation. The calculation is kept in symbolic form until the governing relation has been rearranged for the requested quantity.

Repeat Problem 9.2-4 with local \(n^2(r)\simeq n_1^2[1-2\Delta(r/a)^2]\). The radial equation is harmonic, so \(\beta_q\simeq n_1k_0[1-(2\Delta/V)(2m+l+1)]\); setting \(k_r^2=0\) gives the inner/outer turning radii and the same local wavevector-component construction.

Numbered result. The principal result obtained in the working is

(9)\[k_r^2=0\]

Check. Equation (9) can be checked by substituting it back into the preceding governing relation and reversing the algebraic steps. Check that dimensions agree term by term, then test the simplest symmetry or limiting case for the expected sign and scale. Repeat the substitution with unrounded intermediate values and retain the displayed units; the final unit must have the requested dimension.

Problem 9.3-3 — Absorption plus Rayleigh scattering

Definitions and setup. Symbols are local to this item and follow the chapter convention. Each physical quantity and supplied numerical value is introduced at its first use below; angles are in radians unless a degree symbol is shown, and units are retained through numerical substitution.

Mathematical formulas used. The working uses power and decibel conversions and algebraic rearrangement and dimensional checks.

Worked derivation. The calculation is kept in symbolic form until the governing relation has been rearranged for the requested quantity.

Rayleigh loss scales as \(\lambda^{-4}\): \(2.25(820/600)^4=7.85\) dB/km. Adding the measured 2 dB/km absorption gives \(\boxed{9.85\ \mathrm{dB/km}}\) total.

Numbered result. The principal result obtained in the working is

(10)\[\boxed{9.85\ \mathrm{dB/km}}\]

Check. Equation (10) can be checked by substituting it back into the preceding governing relation and reversing the algebraic steps. Converting the final decibel value back to a linear power ratio checks the logarithm, sign, and accumulated loss budget. Repeat the substitution with unrounded intermediate values and retain the displayed units; the final unit must have the requested dimension.

Problem 9.3-4 — A 5000-mode step fibre

Definitions and setup. Symbols are local to this item and follow the chapter convention. Each physical quantity and supplied numerical value is introduced at its first use below; angles are in radians unless a degree symbol is shown, and units are retained through numerical substitution.

Mathematical formulas used. The working uses algebraic rearrangement and dimensional checks.

Worked derivation. The calculation is kept in symbolic form until the governing relation has been rearranged for the requested quantity.

With \(M\simeq V^2/2\), \(V=100\); therefore \(\boxed{a=V\lambda/(2\pi\mathrm{NA})=138.5\ \mathrm{\mu m}}\). \(\Delta\simeq\mathrm{NA}^2/(2n_1^2)=0.002395\); the 2-km modal spread \(LN_1\Delta/c\) is \(\boxed{23.3\ \mathrm{ns}}\).

Numbered result. The principal result obtained in the working is

(11)\[\boxed{23.3\ \mathrm{ns}}\]

Check. Equation (11) can be checked by substituting it back into the preceding governing relation and reversing the algebraic steps. Check that dimensions agree term by term, then test the simplest symmetry or limiting case for the expected sign and scale. Repeat the substitution with unrounded intermediate values and retain the displayed units; the final unit must have the requested dimension.

Problem 9.3-5 — Power-law graded fibres

Definitions and setup. Symbols are local to this item and follow the chapter convention. Each physical quantity and supplied numerical value is introduced at its first use below; angles are in radians unless a degree symbol is shown, and units are retained through numerical substitution.

Mathematical formulas used. The working uses algebraic rearrangement and dimensional checks.

Worked derivation. The calculation is kept in symbolic form until the governing relation has been rearranged for the requested quantity.

Here \(V=2\pi(a/\lambda)n_1\sqrt{2\Delta}=12.88\) and \(\boxed{M=[p/(p+2)]V^2/2}\). Insert \(p=1.9,2,2.1,\infty\) in this and in the chapter result \(\Delta\tau/L=(n_1\Delta/c)|p-2|/(p+2)\) (retaining the second-order \(\Delta^2\) term at \(p=2\)). The parabolic profile has the smallest spread; \(p=\infty\) recovers the step fibre.

Numbered result. The principal result obtained in the working is

(12)\[\boxed{M=[p/(p+2)]V^2/2}\]

Check. Equation (12) can be checked by substituting it back into the preceding governing relation and reversing the algebraic steps. Check that dimensions agree term by term, then test the simplest symmetry or limiting case for the expected sign and scale. Repeat the substitution with unrounded intermediate values and retain the displayed units; the final unit must have the requested dimension.